Greta Scacchi was not only the most beautiful woman I had ever met but also the most charismatic. I had learnt from interviewing numerous models who wanted to act that the two do not necessarily go together. On several occasions I ended up wondering whether the vacant girl slumped in the chair before me could possibly be the sexy young woman in the pictures she had just handed to me. Patsy Rodenburg, who taught at many drama schools in and around London, has similarly commented:

“I would sit and listen to maybe 200 actors a week. I couldn't understand why some actors did everything right yet didn't engage me or make me clear. Some actors were very impressive, they were clever and displayed intricate skills, but after watching them I forgot their work - it didn't last in my memory. Some were very beautiful but not connected enough to be sexually attractive. What was missing?” (30)

One day, when Greta was still completely unknown, I sat at a cafe table in Covent Garden and watched her coming across the concourse towards me. She was wearing flat shoes, no makeup, her hair pulled back, a kit bag over her shoulder, yet, as she passed every head turned to watch her go by. Her walk was without ostentation, and in it’s quiet grace quite beautiful. On several occasions prior to this I had called ACTION and watched her walking before the camera. As she came towards me there was no discernible difference now. She was all of a piece. She had what Doe Lang has termed “bio-rapport”.(18) She did not just have a body; she was embodied.But, beyond that, she knew exactly who she was and where she was going. Like Bob Dylan’s girl with the Egyptian ring, she acted as if she was in need of nothing.

“When you’re centred, you’re in your body as much as your head. You flow through situations, at ease, natural rather than judging yourself. Your voice is relaxed and warm and you find it easy to connect with others.”(29)

Frances McDormand

Greta Scacchi’s screen career had the fastest lift off of any actor, bar none, that I have heard of, before or since. After being talent spotted in Milan she worked briefly as a model to finance her passage through drama school; and then, at 21 she emerged and stepped straight into leading roles in TV and films, first in the UK, then across Europe, Australia, and finally the USA. Just out of drama school, she had the freshness of the ingenue, but the confidence of the seasoned player. She knew exactly who she was and where she was going, and, so did everyone who came into contact with her — long before they could pronounce her name.

When Greta looked at you you were often left wondering whether she was saying something about herself, or something about you. She looked at you as if she expected to be recognised, expected to receive a response of a certain kind; and inevitably she got just that. On the few occasions where she scored a miss she would see it as a joke or a challenge that she was sure eventually to win. She was very flirtatious, as much with women as with men, and her appeal was often instant. She never wore makeup, unless it had been applied for professional reasons by a makeup artist.The only time her clothes were striking was when she had been dressed by a professional stylist. So, off-screen she always appeared totally natural, totally unaffected.

But Greta was not as simple as she at first appeared. On occasion she would withdraw into her interior world and would have to gather herself before stepping forward. To be herself was a little like going on stage. Caught unexpectedly she could be too shy to look you in the eye; but when she was switched on she was not shy at all, with lingering eye-contact, little touches, intimate tones of voice. Because she was so careless about her appearance it came as a real surprise to discover that her blond hair was dyed. Greta was stepping out into a long line of bottle-blonds, with Debra Harry before her and Madonna still to make her breakthrough, in Desperately Seeking Susan, a year or so on. The most famous of them all, Marilyn Monroe, demonstrated on several occasions her ability to turn her sexual charisma on and off.

“Marilyn Monroe was a classmate of mine when I studied with Lee Strasberg. After class, we would all go to Child's Restaurant on 47th Broadway in Manhattan. Marilyn wore no make-up at all and would dress very simply in low heels, with a scarf covering her blonde hair. No one paid attention to her. She blended in with everyone else. Once when we were talking about this magnetism she said, "Watch!" Whatever she did, she turned it on and everyone we passed, man, woman, and child, reacted to her.”(27)

Gordon Phillips

Paula Strasberg has similarly spoken of riding the New York subway with Marilyn and no-one paying her any attention at all; while on other occasions she would be mobbed as soon as she stepped into the street. Personal development guru, Andrew Leigh, assumes this was because when Norma Jean took on her superstar mantle she began relating to the people around her (19); but I very much doubt this was the case. This is not the way that stars behave except in controlled situations. I would rather suggest that it was brought about by an internal change, from being absent to being filled with the excitement of being her superstar self.

Sally Potter has, generously, suggested that the need to feel full of themselves accounts for much of the bad behaviour indulged in by stars.(29) Most of us live in a default state of vagueness, in chronic retreat from our own skin. The star has mastered the ability to bring themselves into focus, to fill up their being in the moment, and allow it to radiate out. The twin qualities that make this possible are qualities that both Marilyn and Greta had in abundance, those of vulnerability and boldness; it is the tension between the two, brought together in the moment, that leads to great charisma.

In her interesting book, Presence, Patsy Rodenburg outlines three circles of energy. In the First Circle the focus is inward, the energy withdrawn, the breathing shallow; it is the circle in which to be if you don’t want to be noticed. The Third Circle is the opposite stream, it is the Circle of bluff and bombast; the energy is moving out but is unfocussed. Clint Eastwood once said that he could walk anywhere he wanted in New York without being stopped by simply always looking ahead and never slackening his pace; this is Third Circle mode. The Second Circle is described by Ms Rodenburg as the energy of connection.

“In Second Circle your energy is focused. It moves out toward the object of your attention, touches it and then receives energy back from it. You are living in a two- way street - you reach out and touch an energy outside your own, then receive energy back from it. You are giving to and responsive with that energy. You react and communicate freely and spontaneously within the energy you are giving and receiving. You are in the moment - the zone - and moment to moment you give and take.”(30)

But the three circles of energy can be thought of, not just in space, but also in time. The First Circle is the past; The Third Circle, the future; and The Second Circle, the present. In moments of charismatic presence energy flows from a heart-felt past, to a purpose-filled future, through a spontaneous present alive in the here-and-now. Like Terence Stamp Greta seemed to experience intense sensation and could be stopped in her tracks by the impact of light and colour. According to research carried out by Elaine N. Aron On The Highly Sensitive Person, this is more than just a fanciful notion, but describes an innate trait that applies to 15% — 20% of us.(1) Greta’s touch could feel quite electric. The very first time I took her hand I was immediately aware of this.

Charisma is the result of this flow of aliveness in the moment. In Bernie Taupin’s immortal words, it is like “a candle blowing in the wind”.